<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Pro Football 101&#187; Oakland</title>
	<atom:link href="/tag/oakland/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://profootball101.com</link>
	<description>The Premium NFL Betting and Fantasy Football Source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2015 15:42:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>2014 Fantasy Football D/ST Rankings: 11-20</title>
		<link>https://profootball101.com/2014/08/10/2014-fantasy-football-dst-rankings-11-20/</link>
		<comments>https://profootball101.com/2014/08/10/2014-fantasy-football-dst-rankings-11-20/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2014 19:32:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2014 Fantasy Football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baltimore Ravens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Denver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fantasy football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gus Bradley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Giants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oakland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oakland Raiders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pittsburgh Steelers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://profootball101.com/?p=12076</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[11. Houston Texans &#8211; They should bounce back. The D never had a chance last year with the offense playing so ineptly. 12. Baltimore Ravens &#8211; This is a fantasy sleeper and could end up top 6. Another D/ST that was hurt by horrible offensive play. 13. Pittsburgh Steelers &#8211; They’ve invested in a lot [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://commons.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Ravens_vs_Steelers_2008_MNF_3.jpg" target="_blank"><img class="zemanta-img-inserted zemanta-img-configured alignright" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/4e/Ravens_vs_Steelers_2008_MNF_3.jpg/350px-Ravens_vs_Steelers_2008_MNF_3.jpg" alt="" width="245" height="163" /></a></p>
<p>11. Houston Texans &#8211; They should bounce back. The D never had a chance last year with the offense playing so ineptly.</p>
<p>12. Baltimore Ravens &#8211; This is a fantasy sleeper and could end up top 6. Another D/ST that was hurt by horrible offensive play.</p>
<p>13. Pittsburgh Steelers &#8211; They’ve invested in a lot of young talent that past few years. Expect Lebeau to get the most out of it.</p>
<p>14. Detroit Lions &#8211; This unit was undisciplined a year ago. The new regime will have the front 7 humming.</p>
<p>15. Cleveland Browns &#8211; They were a very solid D/ST in 2013. A better offense will help it out.</p>
<p>16. New Orleans Saints &#8211; Rob Ryan’s attacking D yielded excellent returns in year 1.</p>
<p>17. New York Giants &#8211; The Giants changed their philosophy and focused on LBer in the offseason. It will pay dividends.</p>
<p>18. Philadelphia Eagles &#8211; They came on strong over the 2nd half of the season. Some solid young talent on that side of the ball.</p>
<p>19. Jacksonville Jaguars &#8211; They are a deep fantasy sleeper. <a class="zem_slink" title="Gus Bradley" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gus_Bradley" target="_blank">Gus Bradley</a> has built up a solid DL and has a scheme that will force turnovers.</p>
<p>20. Oakland Raiders &#8211; They have a chance to be another nice sleeper. Playing Denver twice a year is no fun, but they’ve added playmakers to this side of the ball.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://profootball101.com/2014/08/10/2014-fantasy-football-dst-rankings-11-20/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
